| Client: |
Times Group
|
| Location: |
Toronto, Canada |
|
Floor Area: |
26155 m2 |
| No.
of Units: |
257 |
| Status: |
Completed in 2004
|
This
two phase project, built in 2003 and 2005, is at the confluence of a
high intensity urban corridor (the Bayview Sheppard Shopping Centre and
new high-rise towers) and tranquil single-family houses along Spring
Garden Avenue.
The urban design task was to balance
the seemingly opposing objectives of urban and suburban scales and
lifestyles by designing a project, which fits into both of these
settings. Townhouses designed adjacent to the existing residential
houses serve as a buffer while the apartment building addresses the
Sheppard frontage. The apartment itself was designed so that its
massing is fragmented to smaller, visually identifiable parts,
compatible with the existing Sheppard Avenue streetscape.
The intent of the project was to
portray a moderately conservative image in deference to the existing
neighbourhood and the expected purchasers, rather than yield to a
temptation of the high-tech presence of the subway, the shopping
centre, and other new high-rise towers to the southeast, and their
associated images.
This project is a “gateway” to an
existing, established, elegant neighbourhood that required an air of
understated elegance, though not pure simplicity. Consequently, the
entire façade design is built up from smaller building elements which
themselves appear to be small buildings within the building. Thus, the
closer each building element is to the viewer the more prominent the
smaller elements of the building become for the viewer and the more the
background planes diminish in importance. In other words, there is a
hierarchy of detail from large to small, which creates visual interest
from far as well as from close up. The overall building massing
culminates to a focal point at the street intersection.
The main entrance to the apartment
building is exactly at this important point of inflection satisfying
the need for project identity while reinforcing the project’s
transitional value to the neighbourhood.
Differentiation of heavy and light,
solid and void, bright and dark materials on the façade create variety
within an otherwise disciplined geometry in pursuit of the aesthetic
objective of “unity in variety”. This design truthfully represents the
functions within and outside of the building. The building is in
harmony with its overall context and successful in the way the
aesthetically desirable views to and from these buildings, are deployed.